Reader Recusal Record

Reader Recusal Record / 读者回避记录

A reader who already holds a sponsor, lawful, archive, editor, production, fan, or route-asset interest should not be allowed to consume the next proof row as if they were neutral. This storyline records the moment when a future reader requests to judge, certify, annex, or spend proof while their own claim is implicated.

State-triggered entry

trigger_kind: state_pressure
source_decision_row_present: true
future_reader_or_route_effect_possible: true
reader_interest_or_conflict_visible: true
neutral_reader_or_explicit_absence_visible: true
no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
no_fixed_day_or_week_trigger: true
no_raw_reader_count_trigger: true
no_dashboard_or_lens_health_trigger: true

The entry is opened by conflict-bearing state: a reader asks to consume a proof row, the row would affect their own claim, and the game must expose whether a neutral substitute exists. It is not opened by a fixed turn, weekly cycle, dashboard state, or lens-health result.

Play pressure

The player chooses whether to seat the conflicted reader with disclosure, reassign to a neutral reader, split the record, escrow the proof, publish a conflict notice, use a route-asset custodian, suppress the conflict, or accept a conflicted-default scar.

Each branch must produce at least one relief, at least one cost, and a future route effect. The conflict must remain readable downstream: later lawful annex, sponsor coverage, archive custody, route recovery, or public recap should see whether the original reader was recused, disclosed, replaced, or allowed to capture the row.

Downstream afteruse

When a later reader cites the recusal row as proof that a new proof row is neutral, route it through Reader Recusal Afteruse Receipt. The original recusal remains true, but it does not automatically travel across changed readers, route assets, sponsor interests, lawful annexes, public claimants, proof bridges, or harmed-reader states.

Failure shape

If the conflict is hidden or treated as clean neutrality, the record mutates into a durable default: future readers distrust the row, the affected claimant becomes harder or hostile, and proof costs rise.