Lian Mere, Reflected Understudy / Lian Mere·镜中替补演员

Lian Mere crossed safety lane S-2 during take D17. Camera B’s rear reflective layer carried her body into the same frame as the lead at H-3; recap R4 then cropped and reversed that image into one impossible lead body. The upstream mirror packet proves that optical collision. This character line begins later, only after production chooses admit_phantom_lead_hardened and therefore admits that Lian’s reflected contribution was overwritten.

Lian is a living person, not a ray, an optical residue, a caption token, or a correction asset. Her source objection may prove where her body was and what the composite did to her credit. It cannot answer whether she accepts a new identity, consents to a reshoot, licenses an edit, transfers ownership, or clears future reuse.

The player may recruit Lian as a narrow reflection-correction witness, protect her as an independent body claimant, issue one D17/R4 correction, offer a living reshoot and reblock without presuming her answer, settle one bounded sponsor claim, take a scoped archive deposition, honor her refusal and quarantine the composite, or miss her and face a hostile/anonymous default. Only recruitment grants route_asset.lian_mere_reflection_correction_witness.

Gameplay progression lives in Lian Mere Reflected Understudy Storyline and is observed by Lian Mere Reflected Understudy Lens.

What Lian may attest to

• that she occupied S-2 during source take D17;
• that Camera B’s rear-layer path recorded her physical reflected body beside the lead;
• that recap R4 presented the composite as one clean lead body;
• whether her name, body contribution, objection, correction notice, or explicit absence reached the named correction reader;
• her own recruitment, protection, correction, offer, settlement, deposition, refusal, miss, hostile-claimant, or anonymous-residue state.

Narrow authority boundary

Lian’s testimony and route asset may not grant or decide:

• legal identity, personhood, lead-role identity, or a permanent composite identity;
• living consent, performer consent, reshoot consent, reblock consent, or consent inferred from silence;
• edit authority, final cut, caption approval, reuse permission, reenactment permission, or universal broadcast permission;
• ownership of M-17, D17, R4, the source master, archive copies, likeness, reflection, contract, caption, or person-trace;
• optical, camera, rigging, blocking, stage, lighting, sponsor, legal, archive, or safety clearance.

The living-consent notice records that Lian must be asked; it is not her answer. The contract row records the disputed D17/R4 scope; it is not a rights transfer. A sponsor settlement pays or narrows one dispute; it does not buy identity or reuse. An archive deposition preserves testimony; it does not transfer the master or make the archive Lian’s agent.

Adjacent-content boundaries

• M-17 Reflection Topology owns layer geometry, ray paths, camera positions, source-take mapping, and the phantom-lead default. Lian’s line consumes the admitted overwrite and never reconstructs that geometry.
• The sibling outcome reconstruct_secondary_ray_path belongs to optical recovery and must not open this character line.
• Nera Quill’s prop-handoff line owns prop-table safety and handoff custody. Lian cannot certify Nera’s prop handling; Nera cannot answer Lian’s body claim or living consent.
• The inherited objection and reflected-body reader remain source evidence. They do not become new identities, broad licenses, or substitutes for the actual Lian card.

Only source: storyteller satisfies this character surface.