Lian Mere Reflected Understudy / Lian Mere 镜中替补演员线

The M-17 packet already solves the optical question: Lian Mere at S-2 physically generated Camera B’s secondary reflection during D17, and recap R4 flattened that reflected body into one impossible lead. This line does not repeat that ray-path investigation. It begins only when the upstream default chooses to admit the phantom lead while leaving Lian’s correction obligation unresolved.

That exact seam turns an evidence-bearing understudy into a recruitable and missable person. The correction review must decide what happens to Lian, her claim, the false composite credit, and the next reader without treating optical proof as identity, consent, ownership, or reuse authority.

State-triggered entry

trigger_kind: state_pressure
source_event: storyteller.event.false_prop_mirror_tape_default.v1
required_source_option: admit_phantom_lead_hardened
required_source_flags:
  prop_mirror_topology.default.admit_phantom_lead_hardened: true
  prop_mirror_topology.state.phantom_default: true
  future_route.understudy_reflection_correction_required: true
rejected_source_option: reconstruct_secondary_ray_path
rejected_source_flags:
  prop_mirror_topology.default.reconstruct_secondary_ray_path: true
  future_route.ray_path_reconstruction_required: true
fixed_turn_day_week_or_raw_counter_gate: false
mirror_geometry_reopened: false

The producer option must gain exactly six packet objects:

1. storyteller.card.lian_mere_reflected_understudy.v1;
2. storyteller.card.lian_mere_reflected_body_correction_docket.v1;
3. storyteller.card.lian_mere_d17_r4_contract_row.v1;
4. storyteller.card.lian_mere_caption_credit_collision.v1;
5. storyteller.card.lian_mere_living_consent_notice.v1;
6. storyteller.card.lian_mere_reflection_correction_reader.v1.

The reconstruct sibling gains none of them. Catalog presence, a manually injected source flag, a generic understudy card, or a reconstruction outcome cannot make the review reachable.

Two inherited source objects

The correction review also requires the existing storyteller.card.prop_mirror_understudy_objection.v1 and storyteller.card.prop_mirror_reflected_body_reader.v1. These carry the upstream body claim and composite-reader contradiction into the character line. They are not regenerated, consumed as geometry, or allowed to substitute for Lian, her docket, contract row, caption collision, consent notice, or correction reader.

Storyline spine

Beat 1 - Production admits the overwrite

storyteller.event.false_prop_mirror_tape_default.v1 resolves admit_phantom_lead_hardened. The admitted source state stays durable: Lian’s reflected body was overwritten, the impossible composite aired, and later correction cannot retroactively clean D17 or R4.

Beat 2 - Six person-and-correction objects materialize

The producer gains the actual Lian card plus five exact support rows. The character appears because production admitted erasing her contribution, not because a generic mirror, caption, contract, sponsor, or archive condition fired.

Beat 3 - Eight exact rows reach review

storyteller.rite.lian_mere_reflected_body_correction_review.v1 requires all six producer-gained objects and both inherited source cards in hand through eight one-ID slots. It consumes only future_route.understudy_reflection_correction_required, preserves the admitted phantom history, and rejects the reconstruction sibling.

Beat 4 - Eight non-equivalent person dispositions

Choice	Rite option	Lian state after	Correction result
0	recruit_reflection_correction_witness	recruited_reflection_correction_witness	sole route asset; named future readback
1	protect_reflected_body_claimant	protected_reflected_body_claimant	independent protected claimant; no recruitment
2	issue_scoped_d17_r4_dual_body_correction	scoped_d17_r4_dual_body_correction	corrects only the named take and recap
3	offer_living_reshoot_and_reblock	living_reshoot_reblock_offer_open	records an offer only; Lian has not answered
4	accept_sponsor_correction_settlement	sponsor_correction_settlement_scoped	settles one correction claim without buying rights
5	take_archive_reflection_deposition	archive_reflection_deposition_scoped	preserves scoped testimony without ownership transfer
6	refuse_composite_identity_and_quarantine	composite_identity_refused_quarantined	refuses the false identity and blocks the composite
7	miss_lian_and_arm_phantom_credit_default	phantom_credit_default_pending	no route asset; hostile/anonymous hard-miss default opens

Every branch must retain Lian’s S-2/D17/R4 scope and the upstream phantom scar. None may claim that the original composite was always clean.

Recruitability and missability

Only choice 0 sets lian_mere.recruited or grants route_asset.lian_mere_reflection_correction_witness. That route asset may require a later reader to preserve the named D17/R4 body-contribution and correction row. It cannot answer for Lian, approve another take, license reuse, own the master, decide identity, or clear production.

Choices 1-6 retain Lian as a protected, corrected, offered, settled, deposed, or refusing non-recruited person. Successful correction is not recruitment. A living reshoot/reblock offer is not living consent. Settlement and deposition are not transfers.

Choice 7 arms storyteller.event.lian_mere_phantom_credit_default.v1. Its hostile-claimant outcome keeps Lian’s unresolved correction claim visible while marking the recruit route missed. Its anonymous-optical-residue outcome removes her name from the closure and hardens the erasure. Both are hard misses and grant no route asset.

Non-duplication and irreversibility

• The upstream mirror storyline owns optical topology; this line reads its admitted result and never recalculates a ray, camera, mirror layer, body coordinate, or crop.
• reconstruct_secondary_ray_path is an explicit rejection condition, not an alternate entrance.
• A new caption can correct R4; it cannot change what aired. A reshoot can create a new take; it cannot become Lian’s answer or rewrite D17.
• The contract row scopes a dispute; it does not create identity, consent, ownership, edit authority, or reuse permission.
• The actual Lian card and living-consent notice remain distinct. A notice to obtain an answer is not the answer.
• Nera Quill retains prop-safety and handoff authority. This packet retains only Lian’s body claim, person disposition, and narrow correction-reader surface.

Implementation evidence

• game-content/storyteller/cards/lian-mere-reflected-understudy-cards.json5
• game-content/storyteller/rites/lian-mere-reflected-body-correction-review.json5
• game-content/storyteller/events/lian-mere-phantom-credit-default.json5
• lens/storyteller-lian-mere-reflected-understudy.runtime.test.ts

The focused runtime evidence must execute the exact producer option, prove the six gains, assign all eight real in-hand cards, exercise all eight ordered choices, prove the sole route asset, reach both default closures, reject reconstruction provenance, and retain every authority denial.