Stability Package Citation Receipt

Stability Package Citation Receipt starts when a later route, desk, reader, or manager cites a resolved stability package as proof that a route is ready, lawful, sponsor-safe, publicly accepted, asset-clean, or metric-clean.

Stability Package Queue chooses package authorship. Package Omission Counterclaim lets an omitted frame return. This storyline owns the later reuse problem: when someone says “the package already proved this,” which source package, selected frame, omitted frame, requested use, harmed reader, and future effect still travel with the citation?

Playable Question

When a stability package is cited later, does production certify the citation inside a named scope, attach an omission addendum, split reader acceptance, rebuild the package state, convert it into makegood inventory, quarantine the citation, or let a false package citation default harden?

Every answer must name source package, subject, selected frame or default author, omitted frame or explicit absence, citation claim, claimed future use, desired reader, harmed reader, proof bridge, selected posture, after-state, and future route effect.

Entry

Open this storyline only from live state pressure:

entry_state:
  trigger_kind: state_pressure
  source_stability_package_visible: true
  package_state_or_selected_frame_visible: true
  requested_package_citation_visible: true
  claimed_future_use_visible_or_explicit_absence: true
  desired_reader_visible: true
  harmed_or_excluded_reader_visible_or_explicit_absence: true
  future_reader_consumes_package_citation_state: true
  player_can_certify_scope_addendum_split_rebuild_quarantine_or_default: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
  no_fixed_day_or_week_trigger: true
  no_raw_package_count_trigger: true
  no_dashboard_or_lens_health_trigger: true

Invalid entry includes a fixed broadcast week, raw package count, dashboard warning, lens-health state, or a package page with no future reader trying to consume it.

Bound Content

Storyline Spine

Beat 1 - A prior package becomes useful again

A later surface wants to spend a stability package: sponsor settlement, public recap, correction slot, lawful hold, route asset transfer, management metric, replay export, or production readiness.

The source package can prove that a frame was authored. It cannot prove that the later reader accepts that frame, that the omitted frame is dead, or that the package is safe for a new use.

Beat 2 - Citation is separated from package authorship

Create Stability Package Citation Docket. The docket must separate:

  • source stability package;
  • source subject;
  • selected frame or default author;
  • omitted frame or explicit absence;
  • new citation claim;
  • claimed future use;
  • desired reader;
  • harmed or excluded reader;
  • proof bridge or absence;
  • future route effect.

Beat 3 - Review prices the citation

Run Stability Package Citation Review. A scoped citation can help a later route proceed, but it cannot turn the package into universal clean proof. If the later use changes reader, route, or legal posture, the review must attach scope, addendum, split acceptance, rebuild cost, or quarantine.

Beat 4 - Future play reads citation state

Later routes read package_citation_state_after, not package_was_resolved. A sponsor reader may accept sponsor-safe package scope while public readers require addendum. A lawful reader may require an annex. A route asset may require package rebuild or makegood inventory before transfer.

Branches

BranchReliefCost or scarFuture state
certify_package_scopepackage proof is usable inside a named scopescope note, proof bridge, or handler burden remainsaccepted-with-scope or costlier
attach_omission_addendumomitted frame becomes visible before citationcorrection, sponsor, edit, or public pressure risesaddendum-required or accepted-with-surcharge
split_reader_acceptanceincompatible readers stop sharing one package claimsource ambiguity and reader hostility risepublic-only, sponsor-only, lawful-only, or split
rebuild_package_statecurrent package readiness becomes visibledelay, package rebuild, or counterclaim cost risespackage-rebuild-required or costlier
convert_to_makegood_inventorypackage proof becomes finite settlement inventorymakegood liability and release proof remainaccepted-with-release or inventory-limited
quarantine_package_citationfalse clean reuse is blockedlater route loses shortcutblocked, quarantined, or recovery-only
false_package_citation_defaultfastest desk files old package as proof of readinesshidden omission or reader mismatch hardenscaptured, hostile, costlier, or recovery-only

Every non-default branch must mutate one relief surface, one cost surface, and one future reader or route effect. No branch may turn one stability package into clean proof for sponsor, public, lawful, archive, editor, route asset, management, and broadcast-reality readers at once.

Default

If later play cites a stability package while source package, selected frame, omitted frame, proof bridge, desired reader, harmed reader, claimed future use, or future effect is hidden, False Package Citation Default fires or arms.

false_package_citation_default:
  false_package_citation: true
  source_package_or_absence: <package id or explicit_absence>
  hidden_or_invalid_package_scope: <scope hidden omitted frame hidden proof absent reader hidden or equivalent>
  capturing_reader: sponsor | public | lawful_reader | archive | editor | route_asset | management | broadcast_reality | equivalent
  harmed_or_excluded_reader: public_reader | fan_public | lawful_reader | sponsor_counterdesk | route_asset_holder | artist_boundary | explicit_absence
  package_citation_state_after: false_clean_package | sponsor_only | public_only | lawful_only | addendum_required | blocked | recovery_only
  future_reader_effect: addendum_required | package_rebuild_required | makegood_release_required | route_costlier | blocked | hostile | recovery_only
  counter_deltas_min: 3
  durable_mutation: true

Non-Goals

  • Not a second stability package arbitration.
  • Not a replacement for omitted-frame counterclaims.
  • Not a generic PR or makegood system.
  • Not valid unless a future reader consumes the package citation state.