Cross-Desk Precedent Recall / 跨台前例召回线

Cross-Desk Precedent Recall is the pressure-system storyline for institutional memory after a scarred result has survived long enough to be useful.

A prior oxygen foreclosure stay, sponsor afteruse citation, appeal residue route, reader collision split, scar convergence quarantine, provenance fork, live-floor compromise, archive enforcement ruling, or management compression report may have been locally correct. The danger arrives later: another desk remembers only the useful half and cites that result as policy for a different current case.

This storyline asks: when the institution remembers a prior exception, who scopes the memory before it becomes a false rule?

Why this is the next useful expansion

The current green corpus is strong at local consequence and afteruse:

• 呼吸追缴扣押线 prevents later seizure of a breath promise without notice, hearing, protected reader, and future scar.
• 赞助后用引证线 prevents sponsor proof from becoming a universal receipt.
• 申诉残留分流线 forces scarred appeal residue to be routed, spent, escrowed, burned, or defaulted.
• 裁定读者冲突线 prevents one source row from satisfying incompatible readers.
• 伤痕汇流台线 prevents a shared stabilizer from becoming clean after multiple histories converge.
• 播出资产来源后生线 keeps aired assets copy-specific.
• 直播现场班组负荷线 proves operational capacity cannot be replaced by higher authority.
• 经营压缩台 prevents costly success from being counted as clean yield.

The remaining gap is institutional generalization. Local systems can be perfectly scarred, yet the archive desk, sponsor desk, management report, inspection shortcut, schedule desk, route asset, edit room, floor crew, public table, or broadcast-reality reader can later say: “we already ruled this once.” Without a playable scope hearing, the institution converts scars into precedent and the player loses the ability to distinguish memory from policy.

This storyline binds:

• 跨台前例召回机制;
• 前例召回案卷;
• 前例范围听证;
• 前例越权默认.

Primary playable question

A desk cites an older result as policy for a current case.

Do you:

• bind the precedent narrowly to matching facts;
• publish a public bulletin with limits;
• grant a one-case variance;
• port the precedent across desks with an addendum and surcharge;
• overrule or retire the old rule;
• quarantine the case so the precedent cannot spread;
• accept the overreach for short-term relief;
• or miss the scope hearing and let the fastest desk make false policy?

Every answer must show source precedent, issuing desk, original facts, original protected reader, source scar, nonbinding boundary, recalling desk, current case, changed fact, excluded reader, cost, and future policy effect.

State-triggered entry

Open this storyline only when all conditions are present:

entry_state:
  trigger_kind: state_pressure
  source_precedent_present: true
  source_precedent_has_scope_or_scar: true
  recalling_desk_present: true
  current_case_present: true
  requested_policy_use_present: true
  claimed_match_basis_present: true
  changed_fact_or_explicit_absence_visible: true
  bound_reader_present_or_explicit_absence: true
  excluded_or_harmed_reader_present_or_explicit_absence: true
  future_policy_effect_possible: true
  player_can_bind_bulletin_variance_port_retire_quarantine_accept_or_default: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
  no_fixed_day_or_week_trigger: true
  no_raw_count_trigger: true
  no_dashboard_or_lens_health_trigger: true

The storyline must fail if entry comes from fixed turn count, calendar interval, chapter quota, raw precedent count, raw scar count, dashboard status, lens health, generic bureaucracy, or generic late-game escalation.

Content pack

Mechanism

跨台前例召回机制 defines source precedent, recall attempt, scope table, branch contract, overreach default, counter surfaces, and replay evidence.

Card

前例召回案卷 records the source precedent, original facts, original ruling, original protected reader, nonbinding boundary, recalling desk, current case, claimed match, changed fact, excluded reader, overreach risk, precedent state, and future effect.

Rite

前例范围听证 is the management action that resolves the recall through narrow binding, public bulletin, variance, addendum port, retirement, case quarantine, accepted overreach, or default.

Event

前例越权默认 fires or arms when a desk generalizes a prior result without preserving facts, boundaries, changed facts, excluded readers, and future policy cost.

Storyline spine

Beat 1 — A local scar becomes institutional memory

A previous branch produced a valid scoped result. It may be a stay, foreclosure, release, public debt conversion, appeal residue, split reader state, trustee appointment, quarantine, provenance copy state, crew compromise, or captured management metric.

That result is not being re-litigated. It is being remembered.

Beat 2 — Another desk recalls it as policy

The archive desk, sponsor counsel, management report, inspection clerk, schedule desk, route-asset holder, edit room, floor captain, public table, pirate relay, or broadcast-reality reader tries to apply the old result to a current case.

The recall may request automatic acceptance, automatic blocking, repricing, foreclosure, quarantine, greenlight, route unlock, or clean metric filing.

Beat 3 — The docket exposes the scope problem

Create or update 前例召回案卷.

The docket must show the original fact pattern before it shows the claimed match. It must name the original protected reader and the excluded or harmed reader in the current case. If a changed fact is absent, that absence is recorded as a weakness or confirmation, not ignored.

Beat 4 — The scope hearing prices institutional memory

Run 前例范围听证.

The player decides whether the memory becomes narrow precedent, public bulletin, one-case variance, ported addendum, retired rule, case-only quarantine, accepted overreach, or default policy.

Beat 5 — Future play reads the precedent state

A later route, license, public statement, schedule object, route asset, edit checksum, floor crew ledger, archive release, sponsor package, or broadcast-reality check must read the precedent state before accepting the current case.

Branch map

Branch	Immediate relief	Cost/scar	Future state
Narrow bind	false policy is blocked; matching case is clearer	delay, handler burden, management pressure	same-facts-only; variance required for changed facts
Publish bulletin	public memory and notice improve	sponsor pressure, inspection heat, public confusion	bulletin required; desk capture costlier
Grant variance	current route opens under changed facts	producer-license pressure, bureau debt, future variance cost	current-case-only; variance bridge required
Port with addendum	cross-desk use becomes possible	source ambiguity, archive debt, route pressure	addendum required; new policy surcharge
Overrule or retire	systemic capture is blocked	current route costlier, retaliation, lawful review pressure	old rule retired; substitute required
Case-only quarantine	drift, fraud, or unsafe spread falls	schedule pressure, route delay, inspection heat	no policy spread; recovery-only until follow-up
Accept overreach	fastest report or route opens	desk capture, excluded reader hostility, scope integrity loss	false policy armed; future hostile reader
Default overreach	no true relief required	source scar hidden; false policy filed	false universal policy, blocked, hostile, recovery-only

Character and desk hooks

• Shen Luo can draft a variance, addendum, retirement clause, or sponsor-scope carve-out, but contract capture rises if the excluded reader is missing.
• Yu Lan can force the bulletin into public memory, but sponsor pressure and witness risk rise.
• Han Yanshuang can bind the precedent to lawful facts or quarantine the current case, but inspection heat and archive debt rise.
• Baiya can prove copy differences through checksum, but source ambiguity and edit debt rise.
• A floor captain can block unsafe staffing precedent, but schedule pressure and crew refusal risk rise.

These are machine-state hooks, not flavor hooks. Named handlers must mutate scope, reader, cost, or future policy states.

Integration notes

• With 呼吸追缴扣押线, a clawback stay or default may later be cited by sponsor, inspection, or public table, but the original reader and protection surface must remain visible.
• With 赞助后用引证线, sponsor proof can become source precedent only with disclaimer, harmed reader, and later reader limits preserved.
• With 申诉残留分流线, an appeal residue can become precedent only after its spend limit and source result are scoped.
• With 裁定读者冲突线, a scoped reader state cannot be recalled later as if the excluded reader was erased.
• With 伤痕汇流台线, a scarred stabilizer can be remembered, but not as clean policy.
• With 播出资产来源后生线, one derivative copy cannot become precedent for every future copy kind.
• With 直播现场班组负荷线, emergency crew coverage cannot become standing staffing policy without captain, safety, and future refusal states.
• With 经营压缩台, a captured metric cannot become management doctrine unless source debt remains visible.

Missability and recovery

This storyline is missed when implementation:

• lets an older scoped result become clean policy;
• remembers only relief and hides source scar;
• hides original fact pattern or protected reader;
• omits changed facts in the current case;
• lets one desk bind every future reader;
• treats public bulletin, variance, addendum, retirement, or quarantine as flavor;
• triggers from fixed turn, day interval, chapter quota, raw count, dashboard, or lens health.

Recovery is allowed only with visible cost:

• late public bulletin;
• lawful variance;
• archive addendum;
• sponsor-scope carve-out;
• edit checksum correction;
• floor-captain safety notice;
• route-asset release;
• overrule or retirement;
• quarantine and recovery-only path.

Replay evidence expectation

storyline_id: storyteller.storyline.cross_desk_precedent_recall.v1
session_id: lens-cross-desk-precedent-recall-v1-<timestamp>
seed: <deterministic-seed>
entry_state:
  trigger_kind: state_pressure
  source_precedent_present: true
  source_precedent_has_scope_or_scar: true
  recalling_desk_present: true
  current_case_present: true
  requested_policy_use_present: true
  changed_fact_or_explicit_absence_visible: true
  excluded_or_harmed_reader_present_or_explicit_absence: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
source_precedent:
  source_id: <stable id>
  source_surface: <surface>
  issuing_desk: <desk>
  original_fact_pattern: <facts>
  original_ruling_or_exception: <result>
  original_protected_reader: <reader>
  source_scar_or_cost: <scar>
  nonbinding_boundary: <boundary>
recall_attempt:
  recalling_desk: <desk>
  current_case_id: <id>
  requested_policy_use: <use>
  claimed_match_basis: <basis>
  changed_fact_or_absence: <fact_or_absence>
offered:
  card: storyteller.card.precedent_recall_docket.v1
  rite: storyteller.rite.precedent_scope_hearing.v1
branch_result:
  selected_response: narrow_bind | publish_bulletin | grant_variance | port_with_addendum | overrule_retire | quarantine_case_only | accept_overreach | default_selects
  precedent_state_after: <state>
  bound_reader_state_after: <state>
  excluded_reader_state_after: <state>
  future_policy_effect: <effect>
  emitted_event: storyteller.event.precedent_overreach_default.v1 | none_if_valid
  counter_deltas:
    relief: []
    cost: []
    future: []
assertions:
  source_precedent_scope_preserved: true
  current_recall_attempt_visible: true
  changed_fact_or_absence_visible: true
  excluded_reader_visible_or_explicit_absence: true
  no_universal_clean_policy: true
  branch_outcomes_diverge: true
  future_policy_effect_visible: true

Non-goals

• Not a gamebuilding governance system.
• Not a setting-law encyclopedia.
• Not a raw count milestone.
• Not a fixed-turn escalation.
• Not a replacement for local consequence systems.
• Not valid unless a later desk recalls a prior scoped result and the scope decision changes future play.