Appeal Stay Afteruse / 申诉暂缓后用线

Appeal Stay Afteruse is the pressure storyline for the moment when a temporary appeal stay is later cited as if it were clean permission.

A stay can be valuable: it can pause enforcement, protect a claimant from erasure, hold proof in archive, stop retaliation, or preserve a breath promise while a harder question remains unresolved. The gameplay gap appears after that success. Sponsor, management, archive, legal desk, public recap, route claimant, or broadcast reality may later say: because enforcement was stayed, the route was clean.

This storyline makes that overread playable.

Why this is the next useful expansion

The current mesh already covers strong appeal and accountability surfaces:

• 申诉残留分流线 keeps unresolved appeal matter from disappearing.
• 申诉报复反压线 makes retaliation after appeal branchy.
• 归档执行案卷 can hold or enforce archive proof.
• 播出合法性转轨线 prevents illegality from turning into permission for free.
• 经营压缩台 prevents costly wins from being reported as clean metrics.

The missing seam is narrower: a temporary stay is neither a merits verdict nor a route-asset release. Without this line, the stay itself becomes a laundering token across sponsor packages, archive releases, public recaps, legal conversion, route unlocks, and management dashboards.

Primary playable question

When a later reader tries to reuse a stay, does the producer carry the stay as a scoped tag, force merits, publish notice, attach lawful annex, escrow proof, restrict sponsor afteruse, quarantine the route, or let the loudest desk overread the stay into false-clean authority?

Every answer must name source stay, stay scope, afteruse request, clean claim, beneficiary, harmed or deferred reader, unresolved merits, minimum condition, and future route effect.

State-triggered entry

Open this storyline only when all required state is visible:

entry_state:
  trigger_kind: state_pressure
  source_appeal_or_stay_present: true
  source_stay_scope_visible: true
  afteruse_request_present: true
  afteruse_request_claims_clean_permission_or_equivalent: true
  beneficiary_of_clean_stay_visible_or_explicit_absence: true
  harmed_or_deferred_reader_visible_or_explicit_absence: true
  merits_unresolved_or_explicitly_narrowed: true
  future_reader_or_route_consumes_stay_state: true
  player_can_scope_merits_notice_annex_escrow_restrict_quarantine_or_default: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
  no_fixed_day_or_week_trigger: true
  no_raw_appeal_count_trigger: true
  no_dashboard_or_lens_health_trigger: true

Do not open this storyline from a calendar cadence, fixed numbered sequence, chapter marker, raw appeal count, dashboard report, lens health, or generic legal cleanup.

Content pack

• 申诉暂缓后用机制 defines stay scope, afteruse states, reader distinctions, branch contract, failure modes, and replay evidence.
• 申诉暂缓后用案卷 records the source stay, afteruse request, clean claim, beneficiary, harmed reader, proof anchor, minimum condition, and future reader.
• 申诉暂缓后用复核 resolves scoped use, merits hearing, public notice, lawful annex, escrow, sponsor restriction, quarantine, or default.
• 暂缓令越权默认 fires or arms when a stay is consumed as merits, release, legality, public truth, or clean management metric.

Storyline spine

Beat 1 — A stay preserved something unresolved

A prior appeal, archive hold, legality pause, retaliation hold, claimant hold, or oxygen clawback stay protected a route, proof, person, breath promise, or reply path.

The stay was real. It prevented one immediate harm. It did not decide every reader’s truth.

Beat 2 — A later desk asks to reuse it

A future surface now wants the stay to do more work:

• sponsor wants a package to keep running;
• management wants a clean metric;
• archive wants to release proof as lawful proof;
• legal desk wants to convert non-enforcement into legality;
• public recap wants to say the appeal produced vindication;
• route claimant wants the stay to block a rival claimant;
• broadcast reality wants the aired pause remembered as innocence.

Create or update 申诉暂缓后用案卷.

Beat 3 — The stay scope becomes the contested object

The docket must show what the stay protects, what it forbids or pauses, and what it does not decide.

stay_scope_required:
  protects: <reader surface or route>
  forbids_or_pauses: <enforcement action>
  does_not_decide: <merits liability ownership custody truth surface or equivalent>
  clean_claim: <what the afteruse requester says it proves>

Absence is allowed only if explicit and costly.

Beat 4 — The producer reviews afteruse

Run 申诉暂缓后用复核. The review must assign handler or absence, proof anchor or absence, minimum afteruse condition, beneficiary, harmed or deferred reader, cost, and future route reader.

No lawyer, archive seal, sponsor cheque, public statement, or management report can turn a stay into universal permission.

Beat 5 — Future readers inherit the scoped result

The result changes later offers. Sponsor afteruse, public recap, archive release, legality conversion, management compression, route asset custody, claimant collision, and broadcast reality must read the stay state before accepting the afteruse.

Valid future effects include:

• accepted_with_stay_tag;
• merits_hearing_required;
• public_notice_required;
• lawful_annex_required;
• escrow_required;
• sponsor_only;
• public_only;
• lawful_only;
• contradiction_pending;
• blocked;
• costlier;
• recovery_only.

Branch map

Branch	Immediate relief	Cost/scar	Future state
Carry scoped stay tag	route continues without lying	notice debt, sponsor discomfort, management pressure	accepted-with-tag, costlier, merits still unresolved
Force merits hearing	false-clean afteruse blocked	schedule, sponsor, handler pressure	hearing required, route delayed
Publish public notice	public false-clean blocked	distrust, inspection heat, sponsor retaliation	public-only, correction-cost, contradiction pending
Attach lawful annex	lawful/archive reader can consume safely	archive debt, bureau favor debt, public delay	lawful-only, annex required, checksum/proof required
Escrow proof or route asset	premature release blocked	route pressure, archive debt, schedule pressure	escrow required, costlier, lawful after review
Restrict sponsor afteruse	sponsor/slot pressure falls	contract capture, public distrust, future correction	sponsor-only, unwind required, public addendum required
Quarantine afteruse	stay laundering blocked	route block, schedule pressure, management pressure	blocked, substitute required, recovery-only
Let overreach default	immediate desk relief may occur	stay becomes false-clean claim	sponsor-only, legality overclaim, public false clean, blocked, recovery-only

Counter contract

Every non-default branch must mutate at least one relief surface, one cost surface, and one future reader or route effect.

counter_deltas_required:
  relief: at_least_one
  cost: at_least_one
  future_reader_or_route_effect: at_least_one

Primary surfaces:

• stay_scope_integrity
• stay_overread_pressure
• appeal_merits_unresolved
• public_receipt_legitimacy
• public_receipt_distrust
• sponsor_stop_loss_pressure
• contract_capture
• archive_debt
• inspection_heat
• lawful_annex_debt
• management_pressure
• producer_license_pressure
• broadcast_legality_risk
• route_asset_integrity
• claimant_hostility
• future_route_acceptance

Integration notes

• With 申诉残留分流线, this storyline opens when residue preserved by a stay becomes afteruse authority.
• With 申诉报复反压线, a retaliation hold can protect a claimant but cannot become proof that the claimant waived future claims.
• With 归档执行案卷, an archive hold can preserve proof but cannot become clean release without annex, escrow, or hearing.
• With 播出合法性转轨线, non-enforcement cannot be consumed as legality conversion.
• With 经营压缩台, a paused appeal cannot be counted as clean liability or clean schedule efficiency.
• With 赞助后用引证线, sponsor use must carry stay scope, sponsor-only restriction, unwind, or public addendum cost.
• With 回顾分发漂移线, a fragment cannot present a stay as vindication unless the notice or contradiction tag travels with it.

Missability and recovery

This storyline is missed when a future route consumes appeal stayed, enforcement paused, archive held, retaliation blocked, or legality not enforced as clean proof.

Missed states include:

• stay_afteruse_unopened;
• stay_scope_missing;
• stay_overread;
• management_false_clean;
• sponsor_only_afteruse;
• archive_premature_release;
• legality_overclaim;
• public_false_clean;
• contradiction_pending;
• recovery_only_afteruse.

Recovery requires visible scar:

• late scoped-stay tag;
• merits hearing;
• public correction or notice;
• lawful annex;
• archive escrow;
• sponsor unwind;
• route quarantine;
• management false-clean appeal;
• accepting public-only, lawful-only, sponsor-only, contradiction-pending, blocked, costlier, or recovery-only future use.

Replay evidence expectation

storyline_id: storyteller.storyline.appeal_stay_afteruse.v1
session_id: lens-appeal-stay-afteruse-v1-<timestamp>
seed: <deterministic-seed>
entry_state:
  trigger_kind: state_pressure
  source_appeal_or_stay_present: true
  source_stay_scope_visible: true
  afteruse_request_present: true
  merits_unresolved_or_explicitly_narrowed: true
  future_reader_or_route_consumes_stay_state: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
source_stay:
  source_row_id: <row id or explicit_absence>
  source_stay_kind: appeal_stay | archive_hold | legality_pause | enforcement_pause | retaliation_hold | claimant_hold | oxygen_clawback_stay | equivalent
  stay_scope: <scope>
afteruse_claim:
  requester: <actor>
  requested_future_use: <use>
  clean_claim: <claim>
  beneficiary_of_clean_stay: <actor or explicit_absence>
  harmed_or_deferred_reader: <reader or explicit_absence>
offered:
  card: storyteller.card.appeal_stay_afteruse_docket.v1
  rite: storyteller.rite.appeal_stay_afteruse_review.v1
branch_result:
  selected_posture: carry_scoped_stay_tag | force_merits_hearing | publish_public_stay_notice | attach_lawful_annex | escrow_route_asset_or_proof | restrict_sponsor_afteruse | quarantine_afteruse | let_overreach_default
  stay_state_after: <state>
  merits_state_after: <state>
  future_reader_or_route_effect: <effect>
  counter_deltas:
    relief: []
    cost: []
    future: []
default_branch:
  event_seen_or_armed: storyteller.event.stay_order_overreach_default.v1 | explicit_absence
assertions:
  - entry_is_state_triggered
  - stay_scope_is_not_merits
  - afteruse_request_and_clean_claim_are_visible
  - beneficiary_and_harmed_reader_visible_or_explicit_absent
  - branch_results_diverge_by_reader_scope_and_future_effect
  - overreach_default_names_actor_claim_and_future_effect
  - future_reader_consumes_stay_state
  - no_universal_clean_stay
  - no_fixed_turn_day_week_raw_count_dashboard_or_lens_health_trigger

Non-goals

• Not a new appeal verdict.
• Not legal governance.
• Not a fixed pause or expiry phase.
• Not a duplicate of appeal residue, retaliation counterpressure, archive enforcement, broadcast legality, sponsor afteruse, or management compression.
• Not valid if the stay becomes clean permission for all readers.