Shen Luo Contract Capture Fork / 沈洛合同捕获分岔线

Shen Luo Contract Capture Fork is沈洛’s upgraded character storyline. It binds his usefulness to visible consent, refusal, proxy authority, and later ownership debt.

The existing mesh now has strong pressure systems: settlement aftershock, narration priority, three-key custody, broadcast insolvency, claimant briefing, proxy posture, and saint selfhood consent. The gap is character conversion. A contract can save a slot, but the human who wrote the contract should become a recruitable asset, sponsor broker, refusal witness, missed route, or hostile witness.

This storyline makes the player answer:

When沈洛 turns crisis into contract language, did he protect someone, sell someone, refuse to be used, get bypassed, or defect as evidence?

Why this is the next useful expansion

三钥羁押撞锁线 creates shared-asset pressure. 叙述优先栈线 decides who can narrate contested truth. 和解反震账本 keeps relief and debt alive after apparent success. 黎星瞳自我线 proves that consent cannot be silently replaced by persona utility.

沈洛 currently sits in that mesh as a useful but under-specified legal manager. Without this storyline:

• contract restructuring can look like a pressure reducer rather than a character route;
• sponsor-friendly legality can hide the person whose consent was folded;
• refusal can be treated as missing data rather than a route asset;
• bypassing沈洛 through company legal can look equivalent to recruiting him;
• later hostile evidence can fire without showing the earlier contract choice that created it.

Bound content pack

This storyline binds:

• 沈洛合同捕获分岔机制;
• 沈洛折叠同意案卷;
• 沈洛同意条款谈判;
• 合同证人倒戈.

State-triggered entry

Open this storyline when all are true:

1. a person, witness, proxy body, voice object, memorial proof, route asset, or refusal receipt needs legal packaging;
2. contract language can relieve at least one live pressure: sponsor stop-loss, broadcast insolvency, schedule collapse, inspection seal, cutroom checksum, settlement aftershock, claimant briefing, narration priority, or three-key custody;
3. consent, refusal, proxy authority, memory refusal, voice/body split, or explicit absence is unresolved or contested; 4.沈洛 can be seated, bypassed, or opposed;
4. the outcome can mutate沈洛’s route status and future route effect.

Never enter from a fixed turn number, day interval, chapter quota, content-count goal, or lens-health state.

Storyline spine

Beat 1 — A contract can save the slot

A crisis reaches the point where legal packaging would produce immediate relief. The player receives or updates 沈洛折叠同意案卷.

The row names the subject, source pressure, consent state, proposed clause, proof or explicit absence, relief, cost, and default if ignored.

Beat 2 —沈洛’s posture becomes a choice

The player can seat沈洛 as protective manager, sponsor broker, refusal witness, lawful escrow handler, or bypass him to company legal.

The choice is not cosmetic. It changes his route status and later availability.

Beat 3 — The consent clause is negotiated

The player runs 沈洛同意条款谈判. The rite requires visible consent/refusal/proxy/absence state and a finite cost.

Beat 4 — Relief arrives with capture, refusal, or witness debt

Valid outcomes include protective recruitment, sponsor brokerage, refusal witness, lawful escrow, missed route, or hostile witness. Every branch changes at least three states or counters.

Beat 5 — Later routes inherit沈洛’s status

Future legal actions must check沈洛’s route state. A protective manager can unlock safer restructuring. A sponsor broker makes sponsor relief cheaper but capture worse. A refusal witness strengthens counterclaims. A missed route increases recovery cost. A hostile witness can arm adverse events.

Branch map

Branch A — Protective manager recruit

沈洛 carries a visible consent or refusal clause personally and becomes a route asset.

selected_posture: protective_manager
state_after_any: [shen_luo_protective_manager, manager_asset_recruited]
requires_any: [explicit_yes, explicit_no, memory_refusal, voice_body_split]
relief_any: [schedule_stability_up, consent_integrity_up, capture_blocked]
cost_any: [manager_leverage_up, contract_scrutiny_up, sponsor_or_inspection_pressure_up]
future_route_effect_any: [protected, lawful_only, public_route_costlier]

Branch B — Sponsor broker complicity

沈洛 saves the slot by writing a sponsor-safe clause that preserves relief and increases later ownership debt.

selected_posture: sponsor_broker
state_after_any: [shen_luo_complicity_up, contract_capture_up]
relief_any: [slot_pressure_down, sponsor_default_paused]
cost_any: [public_receipt_distrust_up, witness_trust_down, future_refusal_claim_armed]
future_route_effect_any: [protected_but_owned, captured, contradiction_pending]

Branch C — Refusal witness

沈洛 refuses clean packaging and records refusal as playable proof.

selected_posture: refusal_witness
state_after_any: [shen_luo_refusal_witness, refusal_legibility_up]
requires_any: [explicit_no, memory_refusal, voice_body_split]
relief_any: [false_consent_blocked, counterclaim_enabled]
cost_any: [schedule_stability_down, sponsor_retaliation_up, inspection_heat_up]
future_route_effect_any: [lawful_only, public_route_costlier, recovery_path_open]

Branch D — Lawful escrow / split consent

The contract keeps the asset alive but refuses to declare a clean owner.

selected_posture_any: [lawful_escrow_handler, split_consent_clause]
state_after_any: [consent_escrowed, split_consent_live]
relief_any: [counterfeit_consent_blocked, route_asset_preserved]
cost_any: [schedule_cost_up, handler_burden_up, future_recovery_cost_up]
future_route_effect_any: [split_canon, contradiction_pending, costlier]

Branch E — Route missed through company legal

The player bypasses沈洛 and accepts immediate company relief. The pressure continues, but his character route is missed.

selected_posture: bypass_to_company_legal
state_after_any: [shen_luo_route_missed, null_company_fold, contract_capture_hardened]
relief_any: [immediate_slot_pressure_down]
cost_any: [witness_trust_down, consent_integrity_down, future_recovery_cost_up]
future_route_effect_any: [protected_but_owned, recovery_only, captured]

Branch F — Hostile contract witness

The player hides refusal, counterfeits consent, overrides refusal witness terms, or demands a free protective clause.

selected_posture_any: [hide_refusal, counterfeit_consent, override_refusal_witness]
emitted_event: storyteller.event.contract_witness_defection.v1
state_after_any: [shen_luo_hostile_witness, manager_asset_lost]
relief_any: [false_clean_contract_exposed]
cost_any: [inspection_heat_up, contract_capture_up, future_recovery_cost_up]
future_route_effect_any: [hostile, lawful_only, recovery_only]

Character intersections

• 黎星瞳自我线 can supply consent or refusal rows where persona utility must not replace selfhood.
• Mu Ning Storyline can supply fragile newcomer clauses where protection risks ownership capture.
• Yu Lan Storyline can turn refusal witness clauses into public receipt or hostile history.
• Orion Breath Storyline can lower immediate pressure while increasing owned settlement risk.
• Inspector Rhee Archive Storyline can subpoena hidden clauses or accept lawful escrow.

Missability and recovery

沈洛’s company pressure is not missable. His personal route is missable.

Miss states:

• bypass to company legal;
• consent left unasked until the company folds it;
• sponsor quiet clause accepted without proof or explicit absence;
• refusal receipt hidden;
• voice/body split treated as consent.

Recovery is allowed only with visible scar:

• recruit him later as refusal witness, not protective manager;
• reopen a clause with public receipt and higher sponsor retaliation;
• escrow the contract with inspection heat;
• sacrifice a route asset to unwind contract capture;
• accept hostile witness and use his testimony to expose a larger false owner.

Replay/session evidence shape

storyline_id: storyteller.storyline.character.shen_luo_contract_capture_fork.v1
session_id: lens-shen-luo-contract-capture-fork-v1-<timestamp>
seed: <deterministic-seed>
entry_state:
  docket_row_id: <row>
  subject_id: <subject-or-asset>
  source_pressure: <pressure>
  consent_state: <state>
  proof_or_absence: <proof-or-explicit-absence>
  shen_luo_available: true
  no_fixed_turn_trigger: true
offered:
  card: storyteller.card.shen_luo_folded_consent_docket.v1
  rite: storyteller.rite.shen_luo_consent_clause_negotiation.v1
branch_runs:
  protective_manager:
    shen_luo_state_after: protective_manager
    future_route_effect: <effect>
    counter_deltas: {}
  sponsor_broker:
    shen_luo_state_after: sponsor_broker
    future_route_effect: <effect>
    counter_deltas: {}
  refusal_witness:
    shen_luo_state_after: refusal_witness
    future_route_effect: <effect>
    counter_deltas: {}
  company_legal_miss:
    shen_luo_state_after: route_missed
    future_route_effect: <effect>
    counter_deltas: {}
  hostile_witness:
    event: storyteller.event.contract_witness_defection.v1
    future_route_effect: <effect>
    counter_deltas: {}
assertions:
  - state_triggered_entry
  - consent_state_visible
  - shen_luo_posture_visible
  - pressure_relief_not_free
  - recruitment_complicity_miss_hostility_diverge
  - future_route_effect_mutates

Non-goals

• Not a generic contract minigame.
• Not a turn-count character route.
• Not a universal schedule repair.
• Not a way to make consent implied by sponsor funding.
• Not a way to delete settlement, custody, narration, or insolvency debt.
• Not a replacement for Shen Luo Storyline; it is the executable fork that makes his personal route durable.